
February 2008 Cover
|
 |
By
Mitzel
What is the state
of our union? Which union? Union is a word with numerous
definitions. The union -- as in E pluribus unum -- is so
vast and so full of so many different peoples. I grew up in Ohio,
but live in Boston. My friends here in the East often confuse Ohio
with Iowa; in fact, just the other day, on a well-known national
public communications channel, one bloviating gasbag, while
addressing recent political events in Iowa, referred to that state
in the union as "Ohio." I've always regretted that they no
longer teach geography, grammar, rhetoric, or good manners in the
public schools.
Some of them may be
overlooked or unattended, but the union has many facets. The
political side is a matter of daily commentary. The current
administration -- while it lasts -- seems to have done its best to
ruin everything it touches: the union's international rep, the
economy, the Constitution, even its own political party. For nearly
eight years, what's left of the citizenry seems lobotomized. It
started back with RayGun, of course, the cascade of lies pitched as
the real thing, on and on, and the volk got schnookered.
The economy? Same
story. Thirty years of lies and dereg and fucking over everyone but
the top tier of the strata. The popular culture of the union? Same
old same old, just uglier and louder. The pornography has gotten
better, but I doubt our union's President will note such a
development in his speech before the assembled Congress (and
others).
I was just on the
horn with my friend Bill, a gent about my age, who wants the gay
world to be infused with the spirit of the times when we both came
to the barricades. Bill made it clear he is not happy with the state
of the gay union, or, I suppose, the GLBTQ union, or is it the LGBTQ
union? (Any more letters on that Scrabble rack and it'll wind up
looking like the top line of your computer's keyboard! Or a
program out of the New Deal on acid!)
Anyway, Bill hasn't
taken well to the drift of events on our union -- same-sex
marriage, gays in the military, the usual litany. I was sympathetic.
But this is where it's at -- as some used to say in the 1960s. It
all makes you wonder. The assault of celebrity and stupidity can
turn any discourse fetid, a long tradition in our union. And so
designed.
These things come and go.
Too bad we only have one lifetime to live; it might be fun to hang
around another lifetime or two to see when it goes. Of course, by
that time, the poor planet will be so awash in plastic trash --
water and soda bottles doomed to outlast the fabulous human race --
it might not be very interesting. The big brain and the opposable
thumb -- many millennia on the long trek of what is quaintly called
natural selection -- lets us pop the tops of beer cans, open the
soda bottles, and thenƒ?
In this time when
narcolepsy seems to be the central theme, where can we go for
rejuvenation? The various regimens change from decade to decade. Was
it true that Somerset Maugham, as well as others, back in the 1930s
had goats' glands implanted into his body to reinvigorate his
sexual prowess, so he could make it with his various boyfriends?
Poor goats. Slaughtered to give old Maugham another chance. Now
there are the various pills for the gentlemen who want to be goats.
Billions of dollars spent to make the cock hard. Get the blood
flowing. Move that sperm.
Think of Hugh
Hefner, our buddy, clad in his informal attire, still at it after
all these years, his daughter running the media empire, a great
family story in the union. There's Hugh pushing the bosoms and
gash, in a wholesome and All-American way. I've never understood
the sexual longings of my straight brethren, but, at that time, I
guess Hef had it all to himself. But then the union changed. I
recall Gore Vidal's comment when Viva first arrived on the
publishing scene (Viva was a rag aimed at the ladies
featuring lots of men and their stuff). Gore: "Women haven't had
the opportunity to see a lot of cock. They're going to see a lot
of cock now." And have for 35 years. The hard state of the union.
Has the union got better
in our lifetimes? Yes and no. My friend Bill should be more
compassionate about the same-sex marriage issue and about
gays-in-the military. Fact is: these demands have been kicking
around since the '60s and '70s. These are simple equity issues
and the couples can come to union and the folks in the military
will, soon, I presume, with a new head of the union, not be drummed
out of their selected career. But amidst the general decay, such
victories seem small stuff. All of which makes our state of the
union seem somewhat tired.
You are not logged in.
No comments yet, but
click here to be the first to comment on this
Common Sense!
|